What is the agreement between clinical diagnosis and radiological imaging in acute groin injuries?
Patients with acute groin injuries
Clinical diagnosis and radiological imaging
Agreement between clinical diagnosis and radiological findings
There is a notable discrepancy between clinical and radiological findings in acute groin injuries, particularly for iliopsoas and rectus femoris injuries, which should be considered during diagnosis.
Adductor injuries account for the majority of acute groin injuries. Iliopsoas and proximal rectus femoris injuries are also common. More than 1 in 5 injuries showed no imaging signs of an acute injury. Clinically diagnosed adductor injuries were often confirmed on imaging, whereas iliopsoas and rectus femoris injuries showed a different radiological injury location in more than one-third of the cases. The discrepancy between clinical and radiological findings should be considered when diagnosing acute groin injuries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andreas Serner
Fédération Internationale de Football Association
Johannes L. Tol
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam
N. Jomaah
Weatherford College
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Copenhagen University Hospital
Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Serner et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e076493dcc343e9cc11ed2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515585123