Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy for detecting coronary calcium (90% vs 52%) and showed significantly higher calcium scores in patients with clinical CAD (p<0.0001).
Cross-Sectional
Does ultrafast computed tomography accurately detect and quantify coronary artery calcium compared to fluoroscopy, and does it correlate with clinical coronary artery disease?
584 subjects (mean age 48 +/- 10 years) with (n = 109) and without (n = 475) clinical coronary artery disease. A subset of 50 patients also underwent fluoroscopy.
Ultrafast computed tomography (20 contiguous 3 mm slices of the proximal coronary arteries)
Fluoroscopy (in a subset of 50 patients) and comparison between patients with vs. without clinical coronary artery disease
Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium (total calcium scores, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for clinical coronary artery disease)surrogate
Ultrafast computed tomography is a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive imaging modality for detecting and quantifying coronary artery calcium, which correlates strongly with the presence of clinical coronary artery disease.
Ultrafast computed tomography was used to detect and quantify coronary artery calcium levels in 584 subjects (mean age 48 +/- 10 years) with (n = 109) and without (n = 475) clinical coronary artery disease. Fifty patients who underwent fluoroscopy and ultrafast computed tomography were also evaluated. Twenty contiguous 3 mm slices were obtained of the proximal coronary arteries. Total calcium scores were calculated based on the number, areas and peak Hounsfield computed tomographic numbers of the calcific lesions detected. In 88 subjects scored by two readers independently, interobserver agreement was excellent with identical total scores obtained in 70. Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy, detecting coronary calcium in 90% versus 52% of patients. There were significant differences (p less than 0.0001) in mean total calcium scores for those with versus those without clinical coronary artery disease by decade: 5 versus 132, age 30 to 39 years; 27 versus 291, age 40 to 49 years; 83 versus 462, age 50 to 59 years; and 187 versus 786, age 60 to 69 years. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for clinical coronary artery disease were calculated for several total calcium scores in each decade. For age groups 40 to 49 and 50 to 59 years, a total score of 50 resulted in a sensitivity of 71% and 74% and a specificity of 91% and 70%, respectively. For age group 60 to 69 years, a total score of 300 gave a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 81%. The negative predictive value of a 0 score was 98%, 94% and 100% for age groups 40 to 49, 50 to 59 and 60 to 69 years, respectively. Ultrafast computed tomography is an excellent tool for detecting and quantifying coronary artery calcium.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Arthur S. Agatston
Warren R. Janowitz
Frank J. Hildner
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Agatston et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=584). Ultrafast computed tomography vs. Fluoroscopy was evaluated on Detection of coronary calcium (p=<0.0001). Ultrafast computed tomography was more sensitive than fluoroscopy for detecting coronary calcium (90% vs 52%) and showed significantly higher calcium scores in patients with clinical CAD (p<0.0001).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5ef84f5d1af861d55efa2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: