Key result
CE-MRI accurately identifies non-transmural scars and infarct grey zones missed by voltage mapping during VT ablation.
Why the study?
Does the integration of CE-MRI with EAVM improve the identification of post-infarct scar characteristics and VT isthmus sites compared to EAVM alone in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Observational (n=15)
Does the integration of CE-MRI with EAVM improve the identification of post-infarct scar characteristics and VT isthmus sites compared to EAVM alone in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Integration of CE-MRI with EAVM during VT ablation is feasible, accurate, and identifies non-transmural scars and infarct grey zones missed by standard voltage criteria.
CE-MRI may enhance VT substrate mapping beyond voltage criteria; leaves open impact on ablation outcomes pending larger validation.
AIMS: Substrate-based ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) relies on electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM). Integration of scar information from contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) with EAVM may provide supplementary information. This study assessed the relation between electrogram voltages and CE-MRI scar characteristics using real-time integration and reversed registration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients without implantable cardiac defibrillator (14 males, 64 ± 9 years) referred for VT ablation after myocardial infarction underwent CE-MRI. Contours of the CE-MRI were used to create three-dimensional surface meshes of the left ventricle (LV), aortic root, and left main stem (LM). Real-time integration of CE-MRI-derived scar meshes with EAVM of the LV and aortic root was performed using the LM and the CARTO surface registration algorithm. Merging of CE-MRI meshes with EAVM was successful with a registration error of 3.8 ± 0.6 mm. After the procedure, voltage amplitudes of each mapping point were superimposed on the corresponding CE-MRI location using the reversed registration matrix. Infarcts on CE-MRI were categorized by transmurality and signal intensity. Local bipolar and unipolar voltages decreased with increasing scar transmurality and were influenced by scar heterogeneity. Ventricular tachycardia reentry circuit isthmus sites were correlated to CE-MRI scar location. In three patients, VT isthmus sites were located in scar areas not identified by EAVM. CONCLUSION: Integration of MRI-derived scar maps with EAVM during VT ablation is feasible and accurate. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies non-transmural scars and infarct grey zones not detected by EAVM according to the currently used voltage criteria and may provide important supplementary substrate information in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijnmaalen et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction (n=15). Integration of CE-MRI with electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) vs. EAVM alone was evaluated on Registration error of merging CE-MRI meshes with EAVM. Integration of CE-MRI-derived scar maps with EAVM during VT ablation was feasible with a registration error of 3.8 ± 0.6 mm, identifying non-transmural scars missed by standard EAVM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: