To compare intrapulmonary vessel volume (IPVV) on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement and CTPA-negative subjects. This study included 207 vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement between March 2019 and November 2024 and 202 CTPA-negative subjects between February 2019 and February 2025. A computer-aided pulmonary vascular segmentation algorithm was employed to automatically measure total intrapulmonary vessel volume (TIPVV), intrapulmonary arterial vessel volume (IPVVa) and intrapulmonary venous vessel volume (IPVVv). Additionally, IPVVs were analyzed and compared within five specific vessel diameter groups: 0.8–1.6 mm, 1.6–2.4 mm, 2.4–3.2 mm, 3.2–4.0 mm, and > 4.0 mm. TIPVV and IPVVv showed no significant differences between groups. The IPVVa measured in CTPA-negative subjects was 47.79 (42.48, 54.10) mL·m− 2, while that in vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement was 44.86 (39.33, 52.58) mL·m− 2. The IPVVa in vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement was significantly lower than that in CTPA-negative subjects (p < 0.01). In pulmonary arteries with diameters of 0.8–1.6 mm and 2.4–3.2 mm, the IPVVa in vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement was lower than that in CTPA-negative subjects (p < 0.05). In pulmonary veins with diameters of 1.6–2.4 mm and 3.2–4.0 mm, the IPVVv in vasculitis patients with pulmonary vascular involvement was higher than that in CTPA-negative subjects (p < 0.05). The computer-aided pulmonary vascular segmentation algorithm can automatically measure IPVV, enabling quantitative assessment of small pulmonary vessel involvement in vasculitis.
Ming et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: