This review reveals systemic failures in Nigeria's EIA framework, suggesting an algorithmic redesign for better compliance and governance.
This work interrogates the operational integrity of Nigeria’s Environmental Impact Assessment Act, moving beyond doctrinal analysis to expose the structural disconnect between regulatory design and real-world compliance. While the Act was conceived as a cornerstone of environmental governance, its execution has remained fragmented, opaque, and weakly enforced—undermining its capacity to safeguard ecological systems amid rapid infrastructure expansion. The study delivers a system-level re-engineering of the EIA process through a rigorously defined, algorithmic nine-stage workflow. Unlike the conventional linear model, this architecture embeds continuous feedback loops, enforces digitally auditable public participation checkpoints, and institutionalises post-approval monitoring as a non-optional control layer. The result is a transition from static compliance to adaptive, verifiable governance. Empirically, the research constructs the first sector-disaggregated EIA inventory for Akwa Ibom State, mapping 50 mandatory-list projects across 17 sectors. The analysis reveals a skewed development profile dominated by infrastructure (18%), housing (14%), and petroleum (10%), with critical transport nodes such as ports and airports minimally represented (2% each). These patterns expose underlying policy priorities and potential blind spots in environmental risk distribution. A comparative benchmark between Nigeria’s prevailing EIA framework and the proposed algorithmic model identifies three systemic failure points: non-transparent screening mechanisms, inadequate scoping disclosure, and the near absence of enforceable post-decision auditing. Addressing these gaps, the study advances a reproducible compliance-engineering template designed for scalability across jurisdictions. Positioned at the intersection of environmental governance, regulatory technology, and sustainable development, this work contributes a policy-ready reform package aligned with the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. It offers both a diagnostic and a deployable solution—bridging legal intent with operational accountability in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: