Contemporary trends and dynamics of insecurity in Nigeria is shaped by a complex interplay of religion, law, and governance, yet the strategic role of religion within security management remains insufficiently theorised in legal and policy scholarship. This article advances the concept of religious statecraft to examine how religious identities, narratives, and institutions are deliberately mobilised by state and non-state actors to influence security outcomes in Nigeria. Drawing on doctrinal legal analysis, institutional review, and documentary evidence, the study interrogates how constitutional secularism operates in practice amid persistent violence, including Islamist insurgency, ethno-religious crises, and farmer–herder conflicts. It demonstrates that religion functions dually as a source of legitimacy and mobilisation as well as a potential catalyst for polarisation when politicised or selectively engaged. The article analyses the insurgency of Boko Haram, recurrent Middle Belt conflicts, and related communal violence to illustrate how religious narratives intersect with structural grievances such as governance deficits, inequality, and weak rule of law. It argues that state responses have largely prioritised militarised and iad-hoc/i approaches, while failing to institutionalise constructive engagement with religious actors despite constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and equality. This gap, the study contends, has undermined public trust, reinforced perceptions of bias, and limited the effectiveness of conflict prevention strategies. Conversely, evidence from interfaith councils, mediation initiatives, and grassroots peacebuilding programmes demonstrates that positive religious statecraft that is anchored in constitutional neutrality, human rights norms, and institutional accountability can mitigate violence, foster reconciliation, and strengthen social cohesion. The article concludes that embedding structured engagement with religious actors within Nigeria’s legal and security frameworks is essential for effective security governance. By aligning religious authority with constitutionalism and human rights obligations, religious statecraft can be transformed from a source of insecurity into a strategic asset for peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and sustainable development.
Paul Gwaza (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: