Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize major bleeding on the basis of the components of the major bleeding definition, to explore major bleeding by location, to define 30-day mortality after a major bleeding event, and to identify factors associated with major bleeding. BACKGROUND: Apixaban was shown to reduce the risk of major hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation in the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial. METHODS: All patients who received at least 1 dose of a study drug were included. Major bleeding was defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Factors associated with major hemorrhage were identified using a multivariable Cox model. RESULTS: The on-treatment safety population included 18,140 patients. The rate of major hemorrhage among patients in the apixaban group was 2.13% per year compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio HR 0.69, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.60 to 0.80; p < 0.001). Compared with warfarin, major extracranial hemorrhage associated with apixaban led to reduced hospitalization, medical or surgical intervention, transfusion, or change in antithrombotic therapy. Major hemorrhage followed by mortality within 30 days occurred half as often in apixaban-treated patients than in those receiving warfarin (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.74; p < 0.001). Older age, prior hemorrhage, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, diabetes, lower creatinine clearance, decreased hematocrit, aspirin therapy, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were independently associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban, compared with warfarin, was associated with fewer intracranial hemorrhages, less adverse consequences following extracranial hemorrhage, and a 50% reduction in fatal consequences at 30 days in cases of major hemorrhage.
“ARISTOTLE showed that the third approved novel oral anticoagulant, apixaban, is an effective alternative to warfarin as are the other two (dabigatran and rivaroxaban) for the prevention of stroke and thromboembolism. These three agents have differences in the trials and cannot be directly compared on a strict level, but the nuance here with apixaban is that the data reported focuses more on the other side of the coin, 'bleeding,' and that these two factors (stroke/TE and bleeding) should be viewed together with respect to the patient. The concept of shared risk and a more focused net clinical benefit-related treatment target is a more balanced approach.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elaine M. Hylek
Claes Held
John H. Alexander
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Boston University
Duke Medical Center
Uppsala University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hylek et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc04a4ee94d1bf1bb2f76b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.549