Randomized trial examines H I gas and star formation in major galaxy pairs, indicating enhanced activity in close encounters.
Atomic hydrogen (H i ) plays a fundamental role in fueling star formation in galaxies. However, the behavior of H i gas in interacting systems, particularly galaxy pairs, remains elusive. In this work, we investigate the H i content of major mergers by crossmatching the extragalactic H i catalog from the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) All-Sky H i Survey with a previously established sample of isolated galaxy pairs. With the superior sensitivity of FAST, we have constructed the largest sample of major mergers with H i detections, consisting of 440 galaxy pairs: 364 spiral-spiral (S+S) and 76 spiral-elliptical (S+E) systems. We examine the H i gas fraction ( f H I ), star formation rate (SFR), and H i star formation efficiency (SFE H I = SFR/ M H I ) for individual galaxies in pairs. The control sample is matched in both stellar mass and redshift. We find that paired galaxies, particularly those in pairs with small projected separations ( d p < 50 h −1 kpc), exhibit systematically lower (by 8.8%) H i gas fractions compared to the control galaxies. The SFR is enhanced for galaxies in the S+S pairs. The SFE H I is ∼15% higher for galaxies in the S+S pairs than in the control galaxies, while spiral galaxies in the S+E pairs show no significant difference in SFE H I compared to the control sample. These findings suggest that the merger process triggers efficient H i gas depletion and enhances star formation, especially in close S+S pairs. Notably, our sample includes 26 red spirals in paired systems. These galaxies exhibit H i deficiency and suppressed star formation activity compared to the isolated galaxies, indicating that interactions may affect quiescent spirals differently, potentially due to mechanisms similar to those of ellipticals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
鄢 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: