Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved the 6-month change in exercise mPAP/CO slope compared to standard-of-care in HFpEF with AFMR (difference -0.93 mmHg/L/min; 95% CI -1.80 to -0.07; p=0.035).
RCT
Randomized
Open-label
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve exercise hemodynamics and functional capacity in patients with symptomatic HFpEF and ≥moderate atrial functional mitral regurgitation?
84 patients with symptomatic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and ≥moderate atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) within the previous year.
Sacubitril/valsartan (target dose achieved in 60% of patients)
Standard-of-care (SOC)
6-month change in the exercise mean pulmonary arterial pressure to cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope, assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography (CPETecho)surrogate
In patients with HFpEF and atrial functional mitral regurgitation, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves exercise hemodynamics, functional capacity, and attenuates exercise-induced increases in mitral regurgitation.
Background: Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) characterizes a high-risk phenotype in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although sacubitril/valsartan reduces functional MR in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), its impact on exercise hemodynamics and the dynamic burden of AFMR in HFpEF remains to be elucidated. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label trial with blinded primary endpoint assessment assigned 84 patients with symptomatic HFpEF and ≥moderate AFMR within the previous year to sacubitril/valsartan (n=41) or standard-of-care (SOC; n=43). The primary outcome was the 6-month change in the exercise mean pulmonary arterial pressure to cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope, assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography (CPETecho). Secondary outcomes included changes in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO 2 ), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), NT-proBNP levels, LA volume and function, and AFMR severity in rest and during stress. Results: At 6 months, sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved the mPAP/CO slope compared to SOC (adjusted between-group difference in change: -0.93mmHg/L/min; 95%CI: -1.80 to -0.07; p=0.035). This hemodynamic benefit was accompanied by improvements in peak VO2 (mean change: +0.9 vs. -0.6mL/kg/min; p=0.002) and KCCQ (median increase: 10 vs. 2 points; p=0.002). Significant reductions in NT-proBNP and LA volume were observed (p<0.001 for both), alongside a significant blunting of the dynamic MR increase during exercise (p=0.020). Target dose was achieved in 60% of patients, with symptomatic hypotension as the primary titration-limiting factor. Conclusions: In HFpEF and AFMR, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with improvements in exercise hemodynamics and peak VO 2 , along with attenuation of the exercise-induced increase in AFMR. These findings suggest a phenotype-specific benefit, warranting confirmation in larger, placebo-controlled, clinical outcome trials.
“The PRAISE-MR trial is the first prospectively randomized trial to demonstrate that sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves exercise hemodynamics, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF and AFMR. These findings underscore that the phenotypic heterogeneity of HFpEF nec...”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sebastiaan Dhont
S Moura Ferreira
Xavier Galloo
Circulation
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Hasselt University
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dhont et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial functional mitral regurgitation (n=84). sacubitril/valsartan vs. standard-of-care (SOC) was evaluated on 6-month change in the exercise mean pulmonary arterial pressure to cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope (Difference -0.93 mmHg/L/min, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.07, p=0.035). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved the 6-month change in exercise mPAP/CO slope compared to standard-of-care in HFpEF with AFMR (difference -0.93 mmHg/L/min; 95% CI -1.80 to -0.07; p=0.035).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a004d8c23ffc69571e2336c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.126.080833
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: