Does dose-adjusted rivaroxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment?
14,264 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), including a subgroup of 2,950 (20.7%) patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30-49 mL/min) with a mean age of 79 years.
Rivaroxaban 20 mg/day (dose-adjusted to 15 mg/day for patients with creatinine clearance 30-49 mL/min)
Dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0)
Stroke or systemic embolismcomposite
In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment, dose-adjusted rivaroxaban (15 mg/day) provides consistent efficacy for stroke prevention and significantly reduces fatal bleeding compared to dose-adjusted warfarin.
AIMS: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal insufficiency are at increased risk for ischaemic stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor metabolized predominantly by the liver, preserves the benefit of warfarin for stroke prevention while causing fewer intracranial and fatal haemorrhages. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 14 264 patients with AF in a double-blind trial to rivaroxaban 20 mg/day 15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30-49 mL/min or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0). Compared with patients with CrCl >50 mL/min (mean age 73 years), the 2950 (20.7%) patients with CrCl 30-49 mL/min were older (79 years) and had higher event rates irrespective of study treatment. Among those with CrCl 30-49 mL/min, the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 2.32 per 100 patient-years with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day vs. 2.77 per 100 patient-years with warfarin hazard ratio (HR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.23 in the per-protocol population. Intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar results (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.17) to the per-protocol results. Rates of the principal safety endpoint (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding: 17.82 vs. 18.28 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.76) and intracranial bleeding (0.71 vs. 0.88 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.54) were similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Fatal bleeding (0.28 vs. 0.74% per 100 patient-years; P = 0.047) occurred less often with rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Patients with AF and moderate renal insufficiency have higher rates of stroke and bleeding than those with normal renal function. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect across dosing groups. Dose adjustment in ROCKET-AF yielded results consistent with the overall trial in comparison with dose-adjusted warfarin.
“Given the prevalence and morbidity associated with atrial fibrillation, and the well-known difficulties with warfarin use, it is exciting to have an alternative which was documented in this study to be effective with no increase in significant bleeding.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Keith A.A. Fox
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Jonathan P. Piccini
Electrophysiology
Daniel Wojdyla
Electrophysiology
European Heart Journal
University of Edinburgh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fox et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03eda60f788938840881db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr342
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: