Key result
Cognitive-behavioral stress management cuts 6-month anxiety scores ~13% vs control in post-PCI MI patients.
Why the study?
While cognitive-behavioral stress management improves psychological status and quality of life in various diseases, its potential benefit in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention needed exploration.
Does cognitive-behavioral stress management improve anxiety, depression, and quality of life in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=250)
Block randomization (block size = 4)
Yes
Does cognitive-behavioral stress management improve anxiety, depression, and quality of life in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.1% vs 7%
p-value: p=0.001
Cognitive-behavioral stress management over 12 weeks significantly improves anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients recovering from AMI and PCI.
Supports adding CBSM to post-PCI AMI care for anxiety relief; extends efficacy from other chronic diseases to cardiovascular recovery.
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) intervention enhances the psychological status and quality of life in patients with various diseases, such as cancer, human immunodeficiency virus infection, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple sclerosis. This multicenter, randomized, controlled study intended to explore the potential benefit of CBSM in ameliorating the anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QoL) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 250 AMI patients who received PCI were randomly allocated to the CBSM (N = 125) and control care (CC) (N = 125) groups, and underwent weekly corresponding interventions for 12 weeks. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) scores were evaluated at baseline (M0), month (M)1, M3, and M6. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: HADS-anxiety score at M1 (P = 0.036), M3 (P = 0.002), and M6 (P = 0.001), as well as anxiety rate at M6 (P = 0.026), was reduced in the CBSM group versus the CC group. HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.027) and M6 (P = 0.002), as well as depression rate at M6 (P = 0.013), was decreased in the CBSM group versus the CC group. EQ-5D score at M3 (P = 0.046) and M6 (P = 0.001) was reduced, while EQ-VAS score at M1 (P = 0.037), M3 (P = 0.010), and M6 (P = 0.003) was raised, in the CBSM group versus the CC group. However, accumulating MACE rate did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.360). CONCLUSION: CBSM ameliorates anxiety, depression, and QoL but does not affect MACE in AMI patients after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=250). Cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) vs. Control care (CC) was evaluated on HADS-A (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for anxiety) score at 6 months (p=0.001). Cognitive-behavioral stress management significantly reduced the HADS-anxiety score at 6 months compared to control care (6.1 vs 7.0, P=0.001) in acute myocardial infarction patients after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: