Key result
Targeted substrate ablation using TriDeca HD mapping suppresses LVAD-associated drug-refractory VT in a case report.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with LVADs poses procedural challenges due to altered cardiac anatomy, mechanical interference, and hemodynamic instability.
Does advanced electroanatomic mapping with the TriDeca catheter improve ablation outcomes in patients with LVAD-associated ventricular tachycardia?
Case Report (n=2)
Does advanced electroanatomic mapping with the TriDeca catheter improve ablation outcomes in patients with LVAD-associated ventricular tachycardia?
The TriDeca high-density mapping catheter successfully facilitated targeted substrate ablation and sustained arrhythmia suppression in two patients with LVAD-associated ventricular tachycardia.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) poses significant procedural challenges for catheter ablation due to altered cardiac anatomy, mechanical interference, and hemodynamic instability. High-density (HD) mapping technologies may improve procedural efficacy and safety in this complex population. We present two cases of drug-refractory monomorphic VT in patients supported by HeartMate 3™ LVADs (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA), successfully managed using the TriDeca™ HD linear mapping catheter (Stereotaxis, St. Louis, MO, USA). In both cases, precise localization of slow conduction zones and targeted substrate ablation resulted in sustained arrhythmia suppression without recurrence during follow-up. These cases highlight the value of advanced mapping systems in overcoming LVAD-related limitations and optimizing ablation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leary et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Left Ventricular Assist Device-associated Ventricular Tachycardia (n=2). TriDeca HD linear mapping catheter was evaluated on Sustained arrhythmia suppression without recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: