Wildfire prediction using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has expanded rapidly, yet synthesis regarding algorithmic configurations, data practices, and transparency remains limited. This systematic review characterizes ML/DL applications in wildfire prediction (2020–2025) using a PRISMA-EcoEvo framework across 341 peer-reviewed studies, with detailed analysis of 110 articles from 2024. Publication output increased steadily, concentrated geographically in China and the United States. Methodologically, ensemble tree-based methods (26.7%) and deep learning architectures (59.4%) coexist, reflecting adaptation to diverse data modalities. Input data are dominated by vegetation/fuel characteristics (44.7%) and historical fire labels (41.2%), while socioeconomic variables remain marginal (1.2%). Evaluation practices distinguish classification and regression tasks, yet metric heterogeneity constrains cross-study comparability. Critically, only 7.7% of studies provided publicly accessible code, with a significant association between algorithm family and code availability (χ2 = 78, p = 0.0012). Collectively, wildfire ML/DL research demonstrates technical advancement but remains geographically concentrated and constrained by limited transparency. Strengthening reporting standards, metric-task alignment, dataset documentation, and open-code practices is essential to translate computational innovation into globally robust, reproducible wildfire decision-support systems.
Lara et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: