PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

C67-02 Cut-off Values or Z-scores? A Comparative Analysis of Impulse Oscillometry in Small Airway Assessment After Post-viral Cough

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JCJ C CalderonFCF Cardenas-PonceCCC Crespo-Shijin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Descriptive cross-sectional study assesses small airway disease prevalence in post-viral cough, suggesting oscillometry technique effectiveness.

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine the prevalence of small airway disease (SAD) in patients with post-viral cough and compare Z-scores and cut-off values for assessment.
  • Descriptive cross-sectional study at a respiratory center involving patients with post-viral cough from May 2024 to August 2025.
  • SAD assessed using PulmoScan Oscillometry according to ERS guidelines applying R5-R20 and Z-score measurements.
  • Statistical analyses conducted using SPSS v30, comparing paired proportions with McNemar’s test and Chi-square tests.
  • Post-viral cough diagnosed in 48.4% (n = 181), with SAD prevalence at 60.2% using cut-off and only 27.8% using Z-scores (p < 0.001).
  • SAD observed in 67.1% of acute cough cases and 60.8% in subacute cases (p < 0.05).
  • FeNO values showed lower results in 86.6% of assessed patients, with no differences based on viral diagnosis, sex, or FeNO.

Cite This Study

Calderon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4efcf03e14405aa9a362https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.2123
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share