Why the study?
PWV predicts cardiovascular events independently of BP but does not distinguish between stiffness in systole and diastole.
Do viscous and elastic carotid wall properties differ in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls?
Do viscous and elastic carotid wall properties differ in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls?
Higher blood pressure increases carotid wall viscosity and hysteresis, while type 2 diabetes is associated with increased carotid diameters, potentially altering blood pressure-flow dynamics.
Prospective studies needed before carotid hysteresis informs hypertension assessment; cross-sectional data leaves open prognostic value.
Objectives: Arterial stiffness as pulse wave velocity (PWV) predicts cardiovascular events independently of blood pressure (BP). PWV does not distinguish between stiffness in systole and diastole. This cross-sectional study aimed to test the hypothesis that viscous and elastic carotid wall properties differ between systole and diastole, distinguishing effects of ageing, hypertension and T2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods: We examined carotid visco-elasticity in 307 people (180 men), with hypertension alone ( n = 69), combined hypertension/T2DM (H-T2DM, n = 99), normotensive (N-T2DM, n = 25) and healthy controls ( n = 114). Diameter ( D )/pressure ( P ) waveforms were measured at right /left common carotid arteries, respectively. Local carotid PWV and distensibility in systole and diastole were evaluated by the D 2 P- loop method, and wall viscosity from hysteresis, the area ( H A ) within the P--D loop, as a dynamic measure of systolic loading and diastolic unloading. Results: Controls’ hysteresis fell quadratically with age ( R 2 = 0.23, P < 0.001). Yet mean H A in hypertensive patients (0.95, 95% CI 0.65–1.23) was six-fold higher than in age-matched controls (0.14, −0.20 to 0.49, P < 0.001) with a 2.5× difference between diastolic ( d Ds ) to systolic ( s Ds) distensibility ( P < 0.05) in hypertensive patients. H A was higher in hypertensive patients and H-T2DMs (0.80, 0.58–1.04) than N-T2DMs (0.20, −0.17 to 0.54, P < 0.05), but similar between controls and N-T2DMs. BP-adjusted carotid diameters in all T2DM were significantly greater compared with controls and hypertensive patients. Conclusion: Higher BP increased wall viscosity, hysteresis and relative difference between systolic and diastolic distensibility across groups. Carotid diameters were increased in all T2DMs, more in H-T2DM, probably altering BP-flow dynamics in T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudici et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: