Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Intention‐behaviour models specify as a boundary condition that the intention‐behaviour relationship should be measured over a short period of delay. However, a measure of intention that exists just prior to performance of the behaviour has limited feasibility and practical utility. Using meta‐analysis, the present study explores the relationship between time and the intention‐behaviour (I‐B) correlation in Fishbein and Ajzen's intention‐behaviour models. Self‐reported behaviours, how intention is measured, and type of behaviour are explored as moderators to this relationship. The average I‐B correlation coefficient remains strong over a prediction interval of as long as 15 years. The I‐B correlation is significantly influenced by the use of self‐report measures of behaviour over time and type of behaviour; however, it is not influenced by how intention is measured.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Donna M. Randall
Andrews University
James A. Wolff
University of Birmingham
British Journal of Social Psychology
Washington State University
Wichita State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Randall et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ef1432eca052da647f218 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01037.x