Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates color stability and surface roughness in resin composites, suggesting implications for dental materials.
Aim: This study was to evaluate the color stability and surface roughness of conventional resin composites after immersion with two different energy drinks.Materials and Methods: 66 disc specimens (6 x 2 mm) were prepared from micro-hybrid (G-ænial Posterior) and nano-hybrid (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) resin composites. Post-polymerization was conducted by storing all specimens in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 hours. Baseline color and surface roughness (Ra) measurements were performed, after which the specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n=11/subgroup) according to the immersion solution used: Group 1 (distilled water), Group 2 (Red Bull), and Group 3 (Burn). After 7 days of immersion, final measurements were recorded. Color variations (ΔE00) were determined using a spectrophotometer and the CIEDE2000 formula before and after the immersion. Data were subjected to ANOVA analysis (α = 0.05).Results: There were no statistically significant differences in color stability between the nanohybrid and micro-hybrid resin composites (p > 0.05). Both resin composites exhibited color changes exceeding the AT threshold (> 1.8) and the PT threshold (> 0.8). The highest ΔE00 values were found in the specimens exposed to Red Bull. Specimens in distilled water showed ΔE00 values below the AT threshold (< 1.8). In terms of Ra values, significant differences were noted between the materials in both the Ra0 and Ra1 measurement intervals (p < 0.001 and p =0.002). The Clearfil Majesty Esthetic specimens had the highest surface roughness, with Red Bull resulting in the greatest Ra values.Conclusion: Over the 1-week immersion period, all tested solutions led to increased color changes and surface roughness in the restorative materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavuz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: