Investigates scaling relations in relational networks, suggesting new insights into gravity and cosmology.
We investigate the emergence of Newtonian-like scaling in discrete relational networks and explore, as a proof of concept, a possible mapping to a chameleon scalar-tensor gravity (CSTG) model. High-precision simulations of Watts-Strogatz small-world networks (N = 300 to 1500 nodes) show that the average Ollivier-Ricci curvature scales as ⟨κ⟩ ∝ a-2.53±0.04, where a is an effective scale factor identified with the inverse edge density. This topological scaling implies an effective relational energy density ρ_red ∝ a-2.5. In the continuum limit, we embed this scaling into the CSTG action with conformal coupling ξ = 1/6 and a runaway potential V(ϕ) = Λ^5/ϕ. We define a criticality order parameter η(z) = L_H/λ_eff - 4, where L_H is the physical Hubble horizon (modulated by the conformal coupling) and λ_eff is the Compton wavelength of the chameleon field. Under the hypothesis m_eff^2 ∝ ρ_red, we solve the full coupled background equations in the Jordan frame. The resulting zero crossing of η(z) occurs at z ≈ 0.23, marking a transition from enhanced to suppressed gravity at low redshift. Solving the linear growth equations with spectral network attenuation (derived from the deep Ricci well, Γ = 0.709) yields predictions for fσ_8(z) that are very close to the ΛCDM baseline. A diagonal χ² analysis gives Δχ² ≈ 0.2 for 12 degrees of freedom (p ≈ 0.41), indicating that the network-induced scaling does not significantly affect structure growth under the small-correction hypothesis Ω_red0 = 0.005. The model satisfies Solar System constraints via the chameleon screening mechanism and offers a falsifiable scalar breathing mode in gravitational waves as a future test. We discuss the main limitations of the approach and outline necessary steps toward a more rigorous derivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan Carlos Alves Tabernero (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: