Key result
A 15-minute HIIT session improves inhibitory control and working memory versus rest.
Why the study?
There is limited evidence that high-intensity interval training improves inhibitory control and working memory more than moderate-intensity continuous exercise.
Does high-intensity interval training improve inhibitory control and working memory in healthy young adults compared to moderate-intensity exercise or rest?
RCT (n=25)
Randomized crossover
No
Does high-intensity interval training improve inhibitory control and working memory in healthy young adults compared to moderate-intensity exercise or rest?
A single 15-minute bout of high-intensity interval training effectively improves inhibitory control and working memory in healthy young adults compared to moderate-intensity exercise or rest.
Supports acute HIIT for cognitive gains in young adults; extends evidence to single-session effects on executive function.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a time-efficient mode of exercise. However, there is limited evidence that HIIT improves inhibitory control and working memory (WM) more than moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICT). This study aimed to explore the effects of HIIT, moderate-intensity interval exercise (MIIT), and MICT on inhibitory control and WM in healthy adults. Twenty-five healthy college students (21.04 ± 2.44 years; 14 females) were recruited to complete HIIT, MIIT, MICT, and a resting session (CON) for 15 min in a randomized crossover design. The HIIT protocol comprised three 3-min bouts at 90% of the maximum heart rate (HRmax) with 2 min of active recovery at 70% HRmax. The MIIT protocol comprised three 3-min bouts at 70% HRmax with 2 min of active recovery at 50% HRmax. A volume-matched MICT protocol was applied at 70% HRmax. The Stroop and 2-back tasks were used to evaluate inhibitory control and WM in post-trials, respectively. Response times (RTs) of the Stroop task significantly improved on the congruent condition in the HIIT session compared to the CON session (p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 0.64), on the incongruent condition in the HIIT session compared to MICT (p = 0.049, Cohen’s d = 0.42) and CON (p = 0.023, Cohen’s d = 0.49) sessions, and on the neutral condition in the HIIT session compared to MIIT (p = 0.029, Cohen’s d = 0.47) and CON (p = 0.012, Cohen’s d = 0.55) sessions. Hits in the 2-back task increased significantly following HIIT compared to MIIT (p = 0.041, Cohen’s d = 0.43), MICT (p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.5), and CON (p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.6). We concluded that a single bout of HIIT effectively improved inhibitory control and WM in healthy adults. These findings support the practical implication of HIIT being beneficial within a short time for enhancing inhibitory control and WM in clinical populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy young adults (n=25). High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), and resting control (CON) was evaluated on Response times (RTs) of the Stroop task on the congruent condition (HIIT vs CON) (Cohen's d = 0.64, p=0.004). A single 15-minute session of high-intensity interval training significantly improved inhibitory control (Cohen's d = 0.64) and working memory (Cohen's d = 0.6) compared to a resting control session.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: