Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Blockchain technology provides decentralized consensus and potentially enlarges the contracting space through smart contracts. Meanwhile, generating decentralized consensus entails distributing information that necessarily alters the informational environment. We analyze how decentralization relates to consensus quality and how the quintessential features of blockchain remold the landscape of competition. Smart contracts can mitigate informational asymmetry and improve welfare and consumer surplus through enhanced entry and competition, yet distributing information during consensus generation may encourage greater collusion. In general, blockchains sustain market equilibria with a wider range of economic outcomes. We further discuss the implications for antitrust policies targeted at blockchain applications.Received May 31, 2017; editorial decision May 29, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lin William Cong
Shanghai International Studies University
Zhiguo He
Central South University
Review of Financial Studies
University of Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cong et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11156e6da19daf8316aaaf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007