By analogy with the change-in-self-consistent-field (ΔSCF) method of atomic physics, the work function of a metal surface is computed as the difference between the total energy of the system in its final state, where one electron is missing from the metal and removed to a large distance from the surface, and its initial state, where the metal is charge neutral. Our ΔSCF expression is a generalization of one given by Lang and Kohn, who assumed the electron density profile to be that of a jellium surface. The ΔSCF expression also reduces in the appropriate limit to an expression derived by Mahan and Schaich. We show that the ΔSCF expression is much less profile-sensitive than other exact expressions for the work function and is therefore well suited for use with approximate profiles. We apply our "variational self-consistent" profiles (more realistic than jellium profiles) to evaluate the ΔSCF work function for a few selected surfaces of simple metals, among them the three low-index faces of Al, for which agreement with experiment is found to be good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monnier et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: