Are there qualitative differences in early diastolic time intervals between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and essential hypertension?
Early diastolic time intervals differ significantly between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and essential hypertension, reflecting distinct myocardial characteristics rather than just the degree of hypertrophy.
To investigate the qualitative difference in myocardial hypertrophy that exists between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and essential hypertension (HT), we measured the mean wall thickness (MWT), the early diastolic time intervals (IIA-MVO time: from the second heart sound to the point of mitral valve opening, MVO-O time: from MVO to the O point of apexcardiogram) and the MVO-O/IIA-MVO ratio. The MWT in HCM and HT was measured by biventriculogram and echocardiogram, respectively. The MWT showed no significant difference between HT (13.1 +/- 3.0 mm) and non-obstructive type of HCM (14.8 +/- 3.7), but the MWT in obstructive type (1.08 +/- 0.24) was significantly thinner than that in HT. As the MWT increased, both IIA-MVO and MVO-O time were prolonged in both groups. But the mode of prolongation was quite different. In HT, the prolongation of the IIA-MVO time was almost always greater than that of the MVO-O time. In HCM, the prolongation of the latter was greater than that of the former. The MVO-O/IIA-MVO ratio in HT was significantly less than that in normal subjects, but those in HCM were significantly greater. These findings suggest that the differences in the early diastolic time intervals between HCM and HT are not due to the magnitude of the left ventricular hypertrophy, but due to myocardial characteristics.
Hamada et al. (Tue,) studied this question.