Population-based analysis shows improved survival in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer post-immunotherapy, indicating significant treatment benefits.
8562 Background: The introduction of immunotherapy (IO) has transformed treatment paradigms in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, large-scale population-based evidence quantifying its impact on survival remains limited. We evaluated overall survival trends before and after the IO era using SEER data. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with Stage IV NSCLC from 2006 to 2020 in the SEER 17 database. Patients were grouped by era: pre-IO (2006–2014) and post-IO (2015–2020). Demographics, histology, and socioeconomic variables were included. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for age, sex, race, and histology. Results: A total of 101,243 Stage IV NSCLC patients were included. The post-IO era was associated with a 19% reduction in mortality compared to the pre-IO era (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.79–0.82; p<0.001). Older age (≥75 years) conferred increased mortality risk (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.30–1.34; p<0.001), while younger patients (<65 years) had better outcomes (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.89–0.93; p<0.001). Male sex (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.14–1.17; p<0.001), non-adenocarcinoma histology (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.28–1.32; p<0.001), and Black race (reference group) were independently associated with worse survival. White (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.81–0.85; p<0.001) and Other races (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.73–0.77; p<0.001) demonstrated survival advantages. Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed significantly improved OS in the post-IO era (median OS 8 vs 10 months, log-rank p<0.001). Conclusions: This large population-based study confirms a significant survival benefit in Stage IV NSCLC patients diagnosed in the immunotherapy era, alongside expected demographic and histologic disparities. These findings support the real-world impact of immunotherapy and underscore the need for continued efforts to address survival inequities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: