Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $222,041/QALY gained compared to standard anticoagulation for proximal DVT.
RCT (n=692)
Is pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation cost-effective compared to standard anticoagulation alone in patients with acute proximal DVT?
Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis is not an economically attractive treatment for proximal DVT overall, though it may offer intermediate value for patients with iliofemoral DVT.
Effect estimate: ICER $222,041/QALY gained
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) in conjunction with anticoagulation therapy is increasingly used with the goal of preventing postthrombotic syndrome. Long-term costs and cost-effectiveness of these 2 treatment strategies from the perspective of the US healthcare system have not been compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, the ATTRACT trial (Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal With Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis) randomized 692 patients with acute proximal DVT to PCDT plus anticoagulation (n=337) or standard treatment with anticoagulation alone (n=355). Costs (2017 US dollars) were assessed over a 24-month follow-up period using a combination of resource-based costing, hospital bills, Medicare reimbursement rates, and the Drug Topics Red Book. Health state utilities were obtained from the Short Form-36. In-trial results and US life tables were used to develop a Markov cohort model to evaluate lifetime cost-effectiveness. For the PCDT group, mean costs of the initial procedure were 13 600; per-patient costs associated with the index hospitalization were 21 509 for PCDT and 3877 for standard care (difference=17 632; 95% CI, 16 117-19 243). The 24-month difference in costs was 20 045 (95% CI, 16 093-24 120). Utility scores increased significantly between baseline and 6 months for both groups, with no significant differences between groups at any follow-up time point. Projected differences in lifetime costs of 16 740 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0. 08, yield an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PCDT of 222 041/QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability that PCDT would achieve a lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio 200 000/QALY gained, PCDT is not an economically attractive treatment for proximal DVT. PCDT may be of intermediate value in patients with iliofemoral DVT. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https: //www. clinicaltrials. gov. Unique identifier: NCT00790335.
Magnuson et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (n=692). Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) plus anticoagulation vs. Standard treatment with anticoagulation alone was evaluated on Lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER $222,041/QALY gained). Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $222,041/QALY gained compared to standard anticoagulation for proximal DVT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: