PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 12, 2008Value in Health328 citationsOpen Access

Multinational Trials—Recommendations on the Translations Required, Approaches to Using the Same Language in Different Countries, and the Approaches to Support Pooling the Data: The ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good Research Practices Task Force Report

View Full Paper
DWD WildSESonya EremencoIMI Mear

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With the internationalization of clinical trial programs, there is an increased need to translate and culturally adapt patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Although guidelines for good practices in translation and linguistic validation are available, the ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Task Force identified a number of areas where they felt that further discussion around methods and best practices would be beneficial. The areas identified by the team were as follows: 1) the selection of the languages required for multinational trials; 2) the approaches suggested when the same language is required across two or more countries; and 3) the assessment of measurement equivalence to support the aggregation of data from different countries. METHODS: The task force addressed these three areas, reviewed the available literature, and had multiple discussions to develop this report. RESULTS: Decision aid tools have also been developed and presented for the selection of languages and the approaches suggested for the use of the same language in different countries. CONCLUSION: It is hoped that this report and the decision tools proposed will assist those involved with multinational trials to 1) decide on the translations required for each country; 2) choose the approach to use when the same language is spoken in more than one country; and 3) choose methods to gather evidence to support the pooling of data collected using different language versions of the same tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wild et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bd28e4ebd09f3dfa91275https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research1992 · 1,619 citations
  2. 2Patient-Reported Outcomes to Support Medical Product Labeling Claims: FDA Perspective2007 · 725 citations
  3. 3Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL® children quality of life questionnaire2007 · 35 citations
  4. 4A Factor Analysis of the Strauss and Carpenter Revised Outcome Criteria Scale: A Validation of the French Translation2004 · 9 citations
  5. 5Reliability and Validity of French, German, Italian, Dutch, and UK English Translations of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey1999 · 60 citations