Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Objectives: To determine the profile of risk of upper gastrointestinal toxicity during continuous treatment with, and after cessation of, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Design: Cohort study with a prospectively constructed, population based, record linkage database containing details of exposure to all community dispensed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and also all admissions to hospital for upper gastrointestinal diagnoses. Setting: The population of Tayside, Scotland. Subjects: 52 293 subjects aged 50 and over who received one or more non-steroidal anti-inflammatory between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 1991 and 73 792 subjects who did not receive one during the same period (controls). Main outcome measures: Admission to hospital for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation, and admission for other upper gastrointestinal diagnoses. Results : About 2% of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory cohort were admitted with an upper gastrointestinal event during the study period compared with 1.4% of controls. The risk of admission for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and perforation was constant during continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory exposure and carried over after the end of exposure. The results were similar for admissions for all upper gastrointestinal events. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory toxicity persists with continuous exposure. There seems to be carryover toxicity after the end of prescribing. These findings have implications for the management of patients requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Key messages The risk of upper gastrointestinal toxicity associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is constant with continuous exposure Gastrointestinal toxicity continues for some time after treatment stops Such toxicity is common in older patients and patients with a history of upper gastrointestinal disease Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be avoided when possible; when they are used the lowest effective dose of the least toxic drug should be used for the shortest period possible
MacDonald et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: