This review discusses the current evidence, indications, and future directions for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusions.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusions?
This review discusses the current evidence, indications, and future directions for percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions.
Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are routinely encountered during coronary angiography, but subsequent revascularization rates are low. This has likely been driven by a historical belief that there is minimal clinical benefit and poor success rates with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in the current era, with the development of new techniques and tools, experienced operators can perform CTO-PCI successfully in the majority of patients. The current indications and benefit of CTO-PCI remain a topic of controversy and debate. There is a growing body of predominantly nonrandomized studies reporting both short-term and long-term outcomes of CTO-PCI. Recent and upcoming randomized-controlled trials in this area will also potentially expand indications in both stable and patients with acute coronary syndrome. In this review, we will discuss the current evidence for CTO-PCI and also future directions in this field.
Sathananthan et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Chronic total occlusion. Percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) was evaluated. This review discusses the current evidence, indications, and future directions for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: