Key result
A claims-based random survival forest algorithm accurately predicted time to unsatisfactory response following initial PAH therapy (C-statistic 0.732), compared to a simplified risk score (0.668).
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop and validate a predictive algorithm for unsatisfactory response to initial pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy using health insurance claims.
Can a claims-based predictive algorithm accurately identify patients with PAH at risk of unsatisfactory response to initial therapy?
Observational (n=4,781)
Can a claims-based predictive algorithm accurately identify patients with PAH at risk of unsatisfactory response to initial therapy?
A claims-based predictive algorithm using factors like healthcare resource use and comorbidities showed good accuracy (C-statistic 0.732) in predicting unsatisfactory response to initial PAH therapy.
May aid early identification of high-risk PAH patients via claims data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive algorithm for unsatisfactory response to initial pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy using health insurance claims. METHODS: Adult patients with PAH initiated on a first PAH therapy (index date) were identified from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (1/1/2010-12/31/2019). A random survival forest algorithm was developed using patient-month data and predicted the "survival function" (i.e. risk of not having unsatisfactory response) over time. For each patient-month observation, risk factors were assessed in the 12 months prior. Unsatisfactory response was defined as the first instance of (1) new PAH therapy, (2) PAH-related hospitalization or emergency room visit, (3) lung transplant or atrial septostomy, (4) PAH-related death or (5) chronic oxygen therapy initiation. To facilitate use in clinical practice, a simplified risk score was also developed based on a linear combination of the most important risk factors identified in the algorithm. RESULTS: In total, 4781 patients were included (median age = 69.0 years; 58.6% female). Over a median follow-up of 14.0 months, 3169 (66.3%) had an unsatisfactory response. The most important risk factors included in the algorithm were healthcare resource use (i.e. PAH-related outpatient visits, pulmonologist visits, cardiologist visits, all-cause hospitalizations), time since first PAH diagnosis, time since index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index, dyspnea, and age. Predictive accuracy was good for the full algorithm (C-statistic: 0.732) but was slightly lower for the simplified risk score (C-statistic: 0.668). CONCLUSION: The present claims-based algorithm performed well in predicting time to unsatisfactory response following initial PAH therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gauthier‐Loiselle et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=4,781). Predictive algorithm (random survival forest) vs. Simplified risk score was evaluated on Unsatisfactory response (new PAH therapy, PAH-related hospitalization/ER visit, lung transplant/atrial septostomy, PAH-related death, or chronic oxygen therapy) (C-statistic 0.732). A claims-based random survival forest algorithm accurately predicted time to unsatisfactory response following initial PAH therapy (C-statistic 0.732), compared to a simplified risk score (0.668).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: