Key result
MR-proANP independently predicted the composite endpoint of death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart failure hospitalization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 3.77).
Why the study?
NT-proBNP predicts mortality and heart failure in HCM, but the prognostic value of MR-proANP compared to NT-proBNP in HCM was unknown.
Does MR-proANP predict death and heart failure-related events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=357)
Yes
Does MR-proANP predict death and heart failure-related events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
MR-proANP is a valuable independent biomarker for predicting death and heart failure-related events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, performing comparably to NT-proBNP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MR-proANP may aid prognostication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; leaves open incremental value over NT-proBNP and impact on management.
Objectives N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts mortality and the development of heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Mid-regional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a stable by-product of production of atrial natriuretic peptide. We sought to compare the prognostic value of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in HCM. Methods We prospectively enrolled a cohort of patients with HCM from different European centres and followed them. All patients had clinical, ECG and echocardiographic evaluation and measurement of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP at inclusion. Results Of 357 patients enrolled, the median age was 52 (IQR: 36–65) years. MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were both independently associated with age, weight, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), wall thickness and left atrial dimension. During a median follow-up of 23 months, 32 patients had a primary end point defined as death (n=6), heart transplantation (n=8), left ventricular assist device implantation (n=1) or heart failure hospitalisation (n=17). Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP (p<10 –4 ) were strongly associated with the primary endpoint, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both peptides were not significantly different. However, in a multiple stepwise regression analysis, the best model for predicting outcome was NYHA 1–2 vs 3–4 (HR=0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.77, p<0.01), LVEF (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.98, p=0.0005) and MR-proANP (HR=3.77, 95% CI 2.01 to 7.08, p<0.0001). Conclusions MR-proANP emerges as a valuable biomarker for the prediction of death and heart failure related events in patients with HCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bégué et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=357). MR-proANP vs. NT-proBNP was evaluated on Composite of death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart failure hospitalization (HR 3.77, 95% CI 2.01-7.08, p=<0.0001). MR-proANP independently predicted the composite endpoint of death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart failure hospitalization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 3.77).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: