Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose:The goal of the paper is to analyze the main differences between the smart mobility idea implementation in Copenhagen and Barcelona.Design/methodology/approach: Critical literature analysis.Analysis of international literature from main databases and polish literature and legal acts connecting with researched topic.Findings: The papers compares the smart mobility solutions implemented in Copenhagen and Barcelona, two cities that have developed comprehensive and innovative transportation systems.While both cities have sustainable, efficient, and convenient transportation systems, they differ in their focus and governance structure.Copenhagen is a leading city in sustainable transportation, with a strong focus on cycling infrastructure and an integrated public transportation system.On the other hand, Barcelona focuses on reducing traffic congestion and improving air quality, with innovative solutions such as a low-emission zone and a smart parking system.Additionally, Copenhagen has a highly centralized governance structure, while Barcelona adopts a more decentralized approach, engaging citizens and stakeholders in transportation decision-making.Originality/value: Detailed analysis of differences between Copenhagen and Barcelona in the case of smart mobility implementation.
Wolniak (Sun,) studied this question.