Key result
Sequential single-leg interval cycling resulted in lower mean arterial pressure compared with double-leg cycling (104 vs 115 mm Hg, P<0.05) and altered local muscle blood volume patterns.
Why the study?
Does sequential single-leg cycling alter cardiovascular and skeletal muscle hemodynamic responses compared to double-leg cycling in young healthy adults?
Does sequential single-leg cycling alter cardiovascular and skeletal muscle hemodynamic responses compared to double-leg cycling in young healthy adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The order of leg performance during sequential single-leg cycling influences local hemodynamic responses, with the inactive muscle affecting the stimulus experienced by the contralateral leg.
INTRODUCTION: Leg order during sequential single-leg cycling (i.e., exercising both legs independently within a single session) may affect local muscular responses potentially influencing adaptations. This study examined the cardiovascular and skeletal muscle hemodynamic responses during double-leg and sequential single-leg cycling. METHODS: Ten young healthy adults (28 ± 6 yr) completed six 1-min double-leg intervals interspersed with 1 min of passive recovery and, on a separate occasion, 12 (six with one leg followed by six with the other leg) 1-min single-leg intervals interspersed with 1 min of passive recovery. Oxygen consumption, heart rate, blood pressure, muscle oxygenation, muscle blood volume, and power output were measured throughout each session. RESULTS: Oxygen consumption, heart rate, and power output were not different between sets of single-leg intervals, but the average of both sets was lower than the double-leg intervals. Mean arterial pressure was higher during double-leg compared with sequential single-leg intervals (115 ± 9 vs 104 ± 9 mm Hg, P < 0.05) and higher during the initial compared with second set of single-leg intervals (108 ± 10 vs 101 ± 10 mm Hg, P < 0.05). The increase in muscle blood volume from baseline was similar between the active single leg and the double leg (267 ± 150 vs 214 ± 169 μM·cm, P = 0.26). The pattern of change in muscle blood volume from the initial to second set of intervals was significantly different (P < 0.05) when the leg was active in the initial (-52.3% ± 111.6%) compared with second set (65.1% ± 152.9%). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the order in which each leg performs sequential single-leg cycling influences the local hemodynamic responses, with the inactive muscle influencing the stimulus experienced by the contralateral leg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2018) studied Healthy adults (n=10). Sequential single-leg interval cycling vs. Double-leg interval cycling was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (p=<0.05). Sequential single-leg interval cycling resulted in lower mean arterial pressure compared with double-leg cycling (104 vs 115 mm Hg, P<0.05) and altered local muscle blood volume patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: