PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Journal of Semitic Studies0 citations

The origin of the Neo-Assyrian Direct Object Marker ana

View Full Paper
NPNa’ama Pat-El

Key Points

  • The paper aims to explain the emergence of the direct object marker ana in Neo-Assyrian.
  • Analyzed the historical development of Akkadian and Neo-Assyrian grammatical structures.
  • Examined inconsistencies in the use of the preposition ana as a direct object marker.
  • Compared the evolution of direct object marking in both Akkadian and Aramaic.
  • Identified internal linguistic changes within Assyrian that led to the development of the direct object marker.
  • Challenged the prevailing view attributing this change to Aramaic influence.
  • Provided evidence supporting the idea of unique syntactic evolution in the Neo-Assyrian dialect.

Abstract

Abstract During its long history, Akkadian typically did not mark its direct objects syntactically, until Neo-Assyrian. This dialect inconsistently marks direct objects with the preposition ana, a preposition that otherwise marks direction. Many scholars have suggested that this development must be a result of contact with Aramaic, where direct objects may be marked with the directional preposition l-. In this paper I will argue that an internal change in Assyrian explains this development better.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Na’ama Pat-El (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e72cb30b38c64201b5fc2https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgag019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper