Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Types of information provided in a Student Course Guide to assist in course selection (CS) were content-analyzed. College courses (N = 215) were coded on 9 variables-instructor and course characteristics, subject matter descriptors, and a criticism dimension-and were correlated with postcourse student ratings of teaching (SRT). Analyses for course levels revealed a developmental trend, shifting from instructor humor and expressive style to learning value variables as predictors of SRT: (a) In 100-level courses, SRTs were predicted from course guide descriptions of instructor's humor. (b) In 200-level courses, SRTs were predicted by instructor's personality and expressive style. (c) In 300-level courses, lack of criticism was the major predictor, followed by interesting course and instructor's humor. (d) At 400-level courses, only academic types of CS information predicted SRTs-interesting readings, interesting course, and instructor's knowledge and expertise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babad et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: