Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Job mobility, occupational mobility and industrial mobility are products of a changing structure of vacancies as well as of individual differences in resources and preferences. The authors develop a model of mobility that includes the macro forces of turbulence and change and includes individual-level attributes as well. Using data from the Current Population Surveys, the 1980 and 1990 census PUMS and from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics for the 1980s, they show that male workers in particular were affected during the 1980s by the push and pull forces that are inherent in a restructuring economy. Occupational and industrial expansion stimulated increased rates of job mobility within industries, while occupational and industrial contraction pushed workers out of their origin occupations and industries. The biggest effect of industrial or occupational contraction was to stimulate exits from employment and cross-over effects were asymmetrical (i.e., industrial net change affected occupational mobility more than the reverse). Furthermore, individuals with few labor market resources generally showed greater sensitivity to structural turbulence. The pattern of gender differences suggest that women were less affected by the push forces of restructuring than were men during the 1980s
DiPrete et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: