Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We study the welfare economics of probabilistic patents that are licensed without a full determination of validity. We examine the social value of instead determining patent validity before licensing to downstream technology users, in terms of deadweight loss (ex post) and innovation incentives (ex ante). We relate the value of such pre-licensing review to the patent's strength, i.e., the probability it would hold up in court, and to the per-unit royalty at which it would be licensed. We then apply these results using a game-theoretic model of licensing to downstream oligopolists, in which we show that determining patent validity prior to licensing is socially beneficial. (JEL D82, K11, L24, O34)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joseph Farrell
Northwestern University
Carl Shapiro
University of California, Berkeley
American Economic Review
University of California, Berkeley
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Farrell et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20367e60a84f4b7dd8e109 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1347
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: