Intravenous procainamide converted acute postoperative atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in 87% of patients compared to 60% with digoxin (p < 0.05).
RCT (n=30)
randomized
30 patients who developed atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery.
Intravenous procainamide vs Intravenous digoxin 0.75-1.0 mg (25 mg/min, maximum dose 15 mg/kg)
Conversion to sinus rhythm, p=< 0.05
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 60%
p-value: p=< 0.05
In 30 patients who developed atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery the efficacy of intravenous procainamide was evaluated and compared with standard acute digoxin digitalisation. The patients were randomized to two groups of 15. One group received procainamide intravenously at a rate of 25 mg/min and with maximum dose 15 mg/kg. In the other group digoxin 0.75-1.0 mg was given intravenously according to renal function and body weight. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred during or immediately after the infusion in 87% of the procainamide group, but only in 60% of the digoxin group (p < 0.05). The mean time from start of treatment to conversion was 40 min in the procainamide vs. 540 min in the digoxin group (p < 0.002). There were no serious complications of the procainamide treatment. Intravenous procainamide conversion of postoperative atrial fibrillation is concluded to be effective and safe and can be recommended as the treatment of first choice in awake and nonintubated postoperative cardiac patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E Hjelms
University of Copenhagen
Scandinavian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Rigshospitalet
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E Hjelms (Wed,) conducted a rct in Acute atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery (n=30). Intravenous procainamide vs. Intravenous digoxin 0.75-1.0 mg was evaluated on Conversion to sinus rhythm (p=< 0.05). Intravenous procainamide converted acute postoperative atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in 87% of patients compared to 60% with digoxin (p < 0.05).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23791c003b3cd7fea5d8c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14017439209099077
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: