What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to evaluate gender disparities in training opportunities for female and male sexual dysfunction in the U.S.

June 6, 2026The Journal of Sexual Medicine

(644) FSD vs MSD training: Assessment of Female Sexual Dysfunction Fellowships in the United States

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HNH NakamuraUniversity of California, Irvine MHM Moukhtar HammadUniversity of California, Irvine ECE Abou ChawarebUniversity of California, Irvine

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Randomized trial explores gender disparities in sexual dysfunction training opportunities, suggesting a need for more focus on female sexual dysfunction.

Key Points

The study aims to evaluate gender disparities in training opportunities for female and male sexual dysfunction in the U.S.
Analyzed Google Trends data for sexual disorder search terms since 2004.
Reviewed academic publications from 1944-2024 to compare research output.
Examined accredited U.S. urology residency program websites for fellowship data.
Google Trends indicated a rising interest in both male and female sexual disorders since 2012.
Academic publications showed comparable research volumes for both disorder types since 1944.
Only 6 fellowships for female sexual dysfunction exist compared to 20-25 for male sexual dysfunction annually.

Cite This Study

Nakamura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23b9ac71a5da9775e757cb https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdag118.566

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Randomized trial explores gender disparities in sexual dysfunction training opportunities, suggesting a need for more focus on female sexual dysfunction.

(644) FSD vs MSD training: Assessment of Female Sexual Dysfunction Fellowships in the United States

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

(644) FSD vs MSD training: Assessment of Female Sexual Dysfunction Fellowships in the United States

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider