Key result
Time-frequency and time-varying methods provide various algorithmic approaches for the reliable quantification and tracking of low-frequency and high-frequency parameters of heart rate variability.
This review summarizes time-frequency and time-varying approaches for quantifying low-frequency and high-frequency components of heart rate variability during non-stationary events.
In the last decades, one of the main challenges in the study of heart rate variability (HRV) signals has been the quantification of the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components of the HRV spectrum during non-stationary events. At this regard, different time-frequency and time-varying approaches have been proposed with the aim to track the modification of the HRV spectra during ischaemic attacks, provocative stress testing, sleep or daily-life activities. The quantitative evaluation of power (and frequencies) of the LF and HF components has been approached in various ways depending on the selected time-frequency method. This paper is an excursus through the most common time-frequency/time-varying representation of the HRV signal with a special emphasis on the algorithms employed for the reliable quantification of the LF and HF parameters and their tracking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Mainardi (2008) conducted a review in Heart rate variability. Time-frequency and time-varying methods was evaluated on Quantification of low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components of the HRV spectrum. Time-frequency and time-varying methods provide various algorithmic approaches for the reliable quantification and tracking of low-frequency and high-frequency parameters of heart rate variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: