Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Jul 2013Values and Pitfalls of the Use of Administrative Databases for Outcomes Assessment Emilie K. Johnson and Caleb P. Nelson Emilie K. JohnsonEmilie K. Johnson More articles by this author and Caleb P. NelsonCaleb P. Nelson More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.048AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Values and Pitfalls of the Use of Administrative Databases for Outcomes Assessment." The Journal of Urology, 190(1), pp. 17–18 References 1 : Predictors of secondary surgery after hypospadias repair: a population based analysis of 5,000 patients. J Urol2013; 190: 251. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Administrative database research infrequently used validated diagnostic or procedural codes. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1054. Google Scholar 3 : Validity of administrative coding in identifying patients with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol2010; 184: 190. Link, Google Scholar 4 : A systematic review of validated methods for identifying ventricular arrhythmias using administrative and claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2012; 21: 148. Google Scholar 5 : Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery2009; 65: 251. Google Scholar 6 : Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data. BJU Int2002; 89: 178. Google Scholar 7 : Validity of administrative data claim-based methods for identifying individuals with diabetes at a population level. Can J Public Health2010; 101: 61. Google Scholar 8 : Strengths and limitations of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes in defining cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2011; 36: E38. Google Scholar 9 : Multicenter study on the value of ICD-9-CM codes for case identification of celiac disease. Ann Epidemiol2013; 23: 136. Google Scholar 10 : Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Urol2011; 185: 1686. Link, Google Scholar Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySharma V and Meeks J (2014) Open Conversion during Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Perioperative Complications and Predictors from National DataJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 6, (1657-1662), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014. Volume 190Issue 1July 2013Page: 17-18 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Emilie K. Johnson More articles by this author Caleb P. Nelson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Johnson et al. (Sat,) studied this question.