CCTA provided the largest LAA measurements compared to TEE and fluoroscopy for the ACP landing zone (24.1 vs 22.3 vs 19.9 mm, P<0.001) and WATCHMAN ostium, with all three modalities correlating.
Observational (n=50)
No
How do CCTA, TEE, and fluoroscopy measurements of the left atrial appendage compare for percutaneous closure planning?
CCTA provides the largest LAA measurements compared to TEE and fluoroscopy, though all three modalities correlate well for landing zone and ostium dimensions, highlighting the need for modality-specific sizing during LAA closure.
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure requires accurate preprocedural measurements, and trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and fluoroscopy can be utilized. However, correlations between these measurements remain inadequately assessed. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAA closure at Vancouver General Hospital who had baseline LAA measurements by CCTA, TEE, and fluoroscopy were included in this analysis. CCTAs were performed with prospective-ECG-gating with Toshiba 320-detector or Siemens second generation 128-slice dual-source scanners, and images interpreted with VitreaWorkstation.™ LAA maximal dimensions were obtained for all patients at: (1) Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP)/Amulet landing zone 10 mm within orifice, (2) WATCHMAN ostium, and (3) WATCHMAN depth measurements. Correlations and agreements were compared. RESULTS: We report 50 consecutive patients who underwent LAA closure (8 ACP, 10 Amulet, 32 WATCHMAN). Average age was 75.2 ± 8.7 years, mean CHADS2 score 3.0 ± 1.3, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc 4.7 ± 1.5. Procedural device implantation success was 100%. For ACP landing zone, mean maximal measurements were 24.1 ± 4.7 mm with CCTA, 22.3 ± 4.9 mm TEE, and 19.9 ± 5.6 mm fluoroscopy (P < 0.001); R value 0.81 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.67 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.80 CTA/TEE. For WATCHMAN ostium, mean maximal measurements were 25.8 ± 4.7 mm CCTA (P < 0.001 vs. fluoroscopy, P = 0.16 vs. TEE), 25.1 ± 4.4 mm TEE (P = 0.016 vs. fluoroscopy), and 23.8 ± 4.9 mm fluoroscopy; R value 0.71 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.65 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.74 CTA/TEE. Depth measurements were 34.3 ± 5.7 mm with CCTA, 31.1 ± 6.5 mm TEE, and 27.8 ± 7.1 mm fluoroscopy (all P < 0.01); and correlations with R value 0.28 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.22 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.56 CTA/TEE. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 imaging modalities correlated with ACP landing zone and WATCHMAN ostium measurements, with CCTA providing the largest measurements, followed by TEE and fluoroscopy.
Saw et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Left atrial appendage closure (n=50). CCTA, TEE, and fluoroscopy was evaluated on LAA maximal dimensions and correlations among CCTA, TEE, and fluoroscopy (p=<0.001). CCTA provided the largest LAA measurements compared to TEE and fluoroscopy for the ACP landing zone (24.1 vs 22.3 vs 19.9 mm, P<0.001) and WATCHMAN ostium, with all three modalities correlating.