Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives: By performing genome assembly, annotation, comparative characterization, and phylogenetic analysis on the complete chloroplast genomes of E. tubulosa and E. japonica—two medicinal plants belonging to the genus Euchresta—this study aims to identify their differential genes, thereby providing fundamental research for screening candidate genes as DNA barcodes for species identification and facilitating the conservation of these endangered species. Methods: Illumina PE150 sequencing was performed. Chloroplast genomes (plastomes) were assembled and annotated with GetOrganelle/SPAdes. Comparative analyses assessed gene content, IR/LSC/SSC structure, repeat profiles, and codon-usage bias. Using related Fabaceae as references, we conducted mVISTA alignments and sliding-window nucleotide diversity (Pi) analyses to identify candidate DNA barcodes. Phylogenies from whole-plastome sequences were inferred with Maximum Likelihood, Bayesian Inference, and Maximum Parsimony. Results: The plastomes measured 153,960 bp (E. japonica) and 150,146 bp (E. tubulosa), with GC contents of 36.30% and 36.20%, respectively, each exhibiting a typical quadripartite structure. IR/SC boundaries were highly conserved without evident expansion or contraction. Repeat statistics were 20/30 palindromic repeats, 57/64 tandem repeats, and 156/159 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in E. japonica/E. tubulosa, respectively. Leucine was the most frequently encoded amino acid, cysteine the least, and codon usage favored A/U at third positions. Five hypervariable loci—rps19, psbA, trnK, matK, and rps16 (Pi > 0.03)—were identified as candidate DNA barcodes. All trees consistently placed both species within Papilionoideae (Fabaceae) and recovered the closest relationship to Sophora macrocarpa. Conclusions: This study provides, for the first time, complete plastomes and candidate barcoding regions for two protected Euchresta species, supplying foundational resources for species identification, resource assessment, and conservation planning.
Yin et al. (Wed,) studied this question.