Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper introduces a temporary definition of minimal models of 3-folds (0. 7), and studies these under extra hypotheses. The main result is Theorem (0. 6), in which I characterise the singularities which necessarily appear on a minimal model, and prove the existence of a minimal model S of a 3-fold of f. g. general type, by blowing up the canonical model X studied in C3-f, imitating closely the minimal resolution of Du Val surface singularities. Apart from techniques familiar from C3-f (computations of the valuations of differentials; cyclic covers; crepant blow-ups of index 1 points which are not cDV), the main new element (Theorem (2. 6) ) is a method of blowing up the 1-dimensional singular locus, based on the Brieskorn–Tyurina result on the existence of simultaneous resolutions of a family of Du Val surface singularities, together with the elementary transformations in (-2) -curves of Burns and Rapoport. Part II is devoted to an exposition of these elementary transformations; much of this is folklore material, but it seems worthwhile to give a detailed account of what seems to be a key phenomenon of higher-dimensional birational geometry. The canonical and terminal singularities introduced in C3-f and here have strong inductive properties, and there is some reason for believing that terminal singularities will provide the natural category for an inductive extension of Mori’s results: elementary contractions (when these exist) specified by extremal faces of the K<0 part of the Mori cone are always discrepant. I have included in §4 conjectures as to what the theory of minimal models and classification of 3-folds will look like in 3 or 4 years’ time, and a section of conjectures in §8 attempting to pin down the non-uniqueness of minimal models in the non-ruled case.
Miles Reid (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: