Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Beyond resource deficiencies, other barriers to care prevent patients from receiving surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to develop and pilot a comprehensive, generalizable tool for assessing the barriers to surgical care. METHODS: Sociodemographic, clinical and 38 questions regarding potential barriers to surgical care were asked during a surgical outreach to two district and one regional hospital in Upper East Region, Ghana. Sites were selected to capture individuals with prolonged unmet surgical needs and represent geographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare development differences. Results were indexed into three dimensions of barriers to care (i.e., 'acceptability,' 'affordability,' and 'accessibility') so that communities could be compared and targeted interventions developed. RESULTS: The tool was administered to 148 participants (98 % response rate): Bolgatanga 54 (37 %); Amiah 16 (11 %); and Sandema 78 (52 %). Amiah had the fewest barriers to surgical care (median index 8.3; IQR 7.6-9.3), followed by Sandema (8.2; IQR 5.3-9.2) and Bolgatanga (6.7; IQR 3.9-9.5). Individual dimension scores (i.e., acceptability, affordability, accessibility) ranged from 10.8 to 18 out of 18 possible points. Main factors contributing to low dimension scores were different between communities: Bolgatanga-cost and healthcare navigation; Amiah-social marginalization and poor medical understanding; Sandema-distance to surgically capable facility. CONCLUSION: This study identified a number of significant barriers, as well as successes for patients' ability and willingness to access surgical care that differed between communities. The tool itself was well accepted, easy to administer and provided valuable data from which targeted interventions can be developed.
Stewart et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: