Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary In the analysis of data it is often assumed that observations y 1, y 2, …, yn are independently normally distributed with constant variance and with expectations specified by a model linear in a set of parameters θ. In this paper we make the less restrictive assumption that such a normal, homoscedastic, linear model is appropriate after some suitable transformation has been applied to the y's. Inferences about the transformation and about the parameters of the linear model are made by computing the likelihood function and the relevant posterior distribution. The contributions of normality, homoscedasticity and additivity to the transformation are separated. The relation of the present methods to earlier procedures for finding transformations is discussed. The methods are illustrated with examples.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
George E. P. Box
David R. Cox
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Birkbeck, University of London
Universidad de Londres
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Box et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d570e475589c71d767dfda — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: