Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The nonmetric "trait list" methodology is widely used for estimating ancestry of skeletal remains. However, the effects of the method's embedded subjectivity on subsequent accuracy and consistency are largely unknown. We develop a mathematical simulation to test whether variation in the application of the "trait list" method alters the ancestry estimation for a given case. Our simulation explores how variations in (i) trait selection, (ii) number of traits employed, and (iii) ancestry choice thresholds affect the ancestry estimation of an unidentified skeleton. Using two temporally and geographically diverse samples, the simulation demonstrates that trait selection, trait quantity, threshold choices, and the exclusion of high-frequency traits had minimal effect on estimation of general ancestry. For all data sets and Runs, Accuracy(AS) was maintained above 90%. The authors close with a discussion on the logistical issues present when choosing traits, and how to avoid ancestry bias.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cris E Hughes
Ricardo (United Kingdom)
Chelsey A. Juarez
New Mexico State University
Taylor L. Hughes
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Journal of Forensic Sciences
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
University of California, Santa Cruz
University of Lincoln
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hughes et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e955ecb6787361d47d5fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01875.x