Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The under‐representation of women in higher education ( HE ) leadership is a persistent global phenomenon. The purpose of this research is to re‐examine this issue through symbolic interactionism ( SI ). Eight women aspiring to leadership were invited to participate in semi‐structured interviews after attending a leadership programme specifically designed to enhance their leadership prospects. Analysis indicated ambiguities and contradictions that surround notions of leadership, in particular how the participants position themselves and are positioned in their workplace. This was evidenced by the meaning they attributed to: recognizing a leader; interactions with existing leadership; and speculation regarding their leadership capacity. Gendered notions were apparent in their constructed meanings. Similarity attraction was also evident, with men being observed as ‘paying it forward’, therefore facilitating promotion. Formal leadership training was advocated rather than experiential processes.
Andrea Gallant (Wed,) studied this question.