Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We have established the generality of using detergents for facilitating the reactivation of 6 M guanidinium chloride-denatured rhodanese that was recently described for the nonionic detergent lauryl maltoside (LM) (Tandon, S., and Horowitz, P. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15615-15618). We report here that not only LM but other nonionic as well as ionic and zwitterionic detergents also have favorable effects in reactivating the denatured enzyme. Not all detergents are useful, and the favorable effects occur over a limited concentration range. Above and below that range there is little or no effect. Zwittergents, which represent a homologous series with varying critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) are effective only above their CMCs. Induction phases occur in the progress curves of rhodanese refolded in the presence of the effective detergents, suggesting the presence of refolding intermediates that are apparently stabilized by detergent interactions. Gel filtration chromatography of rhodanese with and without LM suggests that even though the renaturation of the denatured enzyme requires detergent at concentrations above its CMC, the enzyme does not bind an amount of detergent equivalent to a micelle. It is suggested that renaturation of other proteins might also be assisted by inclusion of "nondenaturing" detergents, although the optimal conditions will have to be determined for each individual case.
Tandon et al. (Wed,) studied this question.