Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
SUMMARY The EM algorithm is a numerical technique for the evaluation of maximum likelihood estimates for parameters describing incomplete data models. It is easy to apply in many problems and is stable but slow. The algorithm fails to provide a consistent estimator of the standard errors of the maximum likelihood estimates unless the additional analysis required by the Louis method is performed. Newton-type or other gradient methods are faster and provide error estimates but tend to be unstable and require the analytical evaluation of likelihoods to derive expressions for the score function and (at least) approximations to the Fisher information matrix. The purpose of this paper is to expand on a result by Fisher that permits a unification of EM methodology and Newton methods. The evaluation of the individual observation-by-observation score functions of the incomplete data is a by-product of the application of the E step of the EM algorithm. Once these become available, the Fisher information matrix may be consistently estimated, and the M step may be replaced by a fast Newton-type step.
Isaac Meilijson (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: