Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This special issue acknowledges important innovations in the world of service and within this domain we are particularly interested in exploring the rise and influence of web-based crowd-sourcing and algorithmic rating and ranking mechanisms. We suggest that a useful way to make sense of these digital service innovations and their novel implications is to recognize that they are materialized in practice. We thus need effective conceptual and analytical tools that allow us to take materiality seriously in our studies of service innovation. To this end, we propose some theoretical ideas relating to a sociomaterial perspective, and then highlight empirically how this perspective helps us analyze the specific service materializations enacted through the algorithmic configuring of crowd-sourced data, and how these make a difference in practice to the outcomes produced.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wanda J. Orlikowski
Susan Scott
MIS Quarterly
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
London School of Economics and Political Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Orlikowski et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69db590d4e9a02dbaa685454 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.09
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: