Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We used a resident continuity clinic to compare prospectively the impact of salary v fee-for-service reimbursement on physician practice behavior. This model allowed randomization of physicians into salary and fee-for-service groups and separation of the effects of reimbursement from patient behavior. Physicians reimbursed by fee-for-services scheduled more visits per patient than did salaried physicians (3.69 visits v 2.83 visits, P .01) and saw their patients more often (2.70 visits v 2.21 visits, P .05) during the 9-month study. Almost all of this difference was because fee-for-service physicians saw more well patients than salaried physicians (1.42 visits and .99 visits per enrolled patient, respectively, P .01). Evaluating visits by American Academy of Pediatrics' guidelines indicated that fee-for-service physicians saw more patients for well-childcare than salaried physicians because they missed fewer recommended ommended visits and scheduled visits in excess of those recommendations. Fee-for-service physicians also provided better continuity of care than salaried physicians by attending a larger percentage of all visits made by their patients (86.6% of visits v 78.3% of visits, P .05), and by encouraging fewer emergency visits per enrolled patient (0.12 visits v 0.22 visits, P .01). Physicians' interest in private practice, as determined by their career plans, correlated significantly with total number of patients enrolled (r = .48, P .05) and total clinic patients seen by each resident during the study (r = .40, P .05): reimbursement was not significantly related to these two outcomes after correction for differences in career plans by fee-for-service and salaried physicians. A resident continuity clinic was used as a model, and it was possible to isolate the effect of reimbursement from patient/parent behavior and to demonstrate that reimbursement method and physician interest in practice motivated physicians to influence the use of outpatient services by their patients.
Hickson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.